Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. Tony Zschau

Campus

Dahlonega

Subject Area

Sociology/HSDA

Location

Nesbitt 3102

Start Date

23-3-2018 10:00 AM

End Date

23-3-2018 11:00 AM

Description/Abstract

Over the last decade, tiny homes (generally described as homes smaller than 500 ft2) have grown in popularity thanks to recent representation in the media (Ford and Gomez‐Lanier 2017). An increasing number of people have begun to adopt this reimagined way of living, and some tiny-housers have sought to live near other tiny-housers, forming tiny house communities (Kilman 2016, Mangold et al. Forthcoming). Little systematic research focusing on the tiny-housers views of community exists. To provide initial insights, 30 interviews were conducted with people at various stages in their tiny house journeys. The 30 interviews were transcribed and analyzed in Nvivo 11. Preliminary findings suggest that many of these tiny-housers want to redefine the normative American concept of community by rejecting sub-urban frameworks and borrowing elements from both strong place and interest-based community models. They seek to accomplish this vision through one or more of the following: (i) increased community participation, (ii) shared spaces and resources, and (iii) development of significant relationships with neighbors rooted in mutual support and frequent interaction. While participants strive for this type of community, they also insist upon a clear recognition of personal space and boundaries. Participants also express an interest in having diverse communities, yet desire to maintain many common interests and goals. These community elements are not entirely unique to the tiny house movement. The small space, however, both encourages and facilitates this kind of community participation.

Key words: Tiny house, lifestyle, downsizing, good life, alternative lifestyle, minimalism

Ford, Jasmine and Lilia Gomez‐Lanier. 2017. "Are Tiny Homes Here to Stay? A Review of Literature on the Tiny House Movement." Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 45(4):394-405.

Kilman, Charlie. 2016. "Small House, Big Impact: The Effect of Tiny Houses on Community and Environment." Undergraduate Journal of Humanistic Studies 2.

Mangold, Severin, Chelsey Willoughby, Devin Hing, Codey Collins and Toralf Zschau. Forthcoming. "Why Live Tiny? A New Multi-Dimensional Model." Sociological Spectrum.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Share

COinS
 
Mar 23rd, 10:00 AM Mar 23rd, 11:00 AM

Stronger Together: Tiny-housers’ Views of Community

Nesbitt 3102

Over the last decade, tiny homes (generally described as homes smaller than 500 ft2) have grown in popularity thanks to recent representation in the media (Ford and Gomez‐Lanier 2017). An increasing number of people have begun to adopt this reimagined way of living, and some tiny-housers have sought to live near other tiny-housers, forming tiny house communities (Kilman 2016, Mangold et al. Forthcoming). Little systematic research focusing on the tiny-housers views of community exists. To provide initial insights, 30 interviews were conducted with people at various stages in their tiny house journeys. The 30 interviews were transcribed and analyzed in Nvivo 11. Preliminary findings suggest that many of these tiny-housers want to redefine the normative American concept of community by rejecting sub-urban frameworks and borrowing elements from both strong place and interest-based community models. They seek to accomplish this vision through one or more of the following: (i) increased community participation, (ii) shared spaces and resources, and (iii) development of significant relationships with neighbors rooted in mutual support and frequent interaction. While participants strive for this type of community, they also insist upon a clear recognition of personal space and boundaries. Participants also express an interest in having diverse communities, yet desire to maintain many common interests and goals. These community elements are not entirely unique to the tiny house movement. The small space, however, both encourages and facilitates this kind of community participation.

Key words: Tiny house, lifestyle, downsizing, good life, alternative lifestyle, minimalism

Ford, Jasmine and Lilia Gomez‐Lanier. 2017. "Are Tiny Homes Here to Stay? A Review of Literature on the Tiny House Movement." Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 45(4):394-405.

Kilman, Charlie. 2016. "Small House, Big Impact: The Effect of Tiny Houses on Community and Environment." Undergraduate Journal of Humanistic Studies 2.

Mangold, Severin, Chelsey Willoughby, Devin Hing, Codey Collins and Toralf Zschau. Forthcoming. "Why Live Tiny? A New Multi-Dimensional Model." Sociological Spectrum.