Title

A Decline in the Killing of Kids: An Examination of the Juvenile Death Penalty

Presenter Information

Amanda KelleyFollow

Faculty Mentor(s)

Stuart Batchelder

Campus

Dahlonega

Proposal Type

Oral Presentation

Subject Area

Criminal Justice

Location

MPR 2

Start Date

22-3-2019 1:00 PM

End Date

22-3-2019 2:00 PM

Description/Abstract

The execution of juveniles, individuals under the age of eighteen, is a hotly contested issue, with a variety of authors weighing in on the topic. This paper reviews those arguments in an effort to suggest alternative sanctions in lieu of death for juvenile offenders. We discuss how theories that seem to suggest a need for increasing punishment do not really support stiffer sanctions for young offenders under the age of eighteen, in light of the ultimate outcome. It will be argued that the death penalty was a pointless way of trying to prevent juveniles from committing violent crimes and homicides. Additionally, arguments centered around the Eighth Amendment will be examined. Currently there has been a national consensus developing against the juvenile death penalty accompanying both an increase in legislation barring it, and a decrease in the support by jurors who refuse to convict. Additionally, brain-imaging of juveniles is examined regarding the findings on culpability of juveniles when compared to adults. The purpose of this paper is to find a relationship between the decline of the imposition of the juvenile death penalty and the increase of societal opposition of the juvenile death penalty. Authors conclude that since juveniles are less culpable for their crimes and are amendable to change, the harshest sentence that should be enforced on the worst juvenile offenders would be life with parole.

Media Format

flash_audio

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Mar 22nd, 1:00 PM Mar 22nd, 2:00 PM

A Decline in the Killing of Kids: An Examination of the Juvenile Death Penalty

MPR 2

The execution of juveniles, individuals under the age of eighteen, is a hotly contested issue, with a variety of authors weighing in on the topic. This paper reviews those arguments in an effort to suggest alternative sanctions in lieu of death for juvenile offenders. We discuss how theories that seem to suggest a need for increasing punishment do not really support stiffer sanctions for young offenders under the age of eighteen, in light of the ultimate outcome. It will be argued that the death penalty was a pointless way of trying to prevent juveniles from committing violent crimes and homicides. Additionally, arguments centered around the Eighth Amendment will be examined. Currently there has been a national consensus developing against the juvenile death penalty accompanying both an increase in legislation barring it, and a decrease in the support by jurors who refuse to convict. Additionally, brain-imaging of juveniles is examined regarding the findings on culpability of juveniles when compared to adults. The purpose of this paper is to find a relationship between the decline of the imposition of the juvenile death penalty and the increase of societal opposition of the juvenile death penalty. Authors conclude that since juveniles are less culpable for their crimes and are amendable to change, the harshest sentence that should be enforced on the worst juvenile offenders would be life with parole.